amqp — archive

Groups - AMQP Core Specification - Working Draft 4 uploaded

From: Ram Jeyaraman <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:41:00 -0000

Yes, for the DTD, ensure it is well formed and valid. And if there is any code snippets ensure they compile and run properly. From: Raphael Cohn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 10:51 PM To: Ram Jeyaraman Cc: Rob Godfrey; [email protected] Subject: Re: [amqp] Groups - AMQP Core Specification - Working Draft 4 uploaded How can a DTD be executable? Well formed, valid SGML, yes, but executable? Raphael Cohn Chief Architect [email protected] StormMQ Limited UK Office: Gateshead int'l Business Centre, Mulgrave Terrace, Gateshead, NE8 1AN, United Kingdom Telephone: +44 845 3712 567 Registered office: 16 Anchor Street, Chelmsford, Essex, CM2 0JY, United Kingdom StormMQ Limited is Registered in England and Wales under Company Number 07175657 StormMQ.com On 3 Feb 2012, at 00:06, Ram Jeyaraman < [email protected] > wrote: Also, please verify that all XML, XML Schema, and code snippets in the specification are well formed and valid. Same comment applies to the DTD file – ensure it is machine executable. From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] On Behalf Of Ram Jeyaraman Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 3:39 PM To: Rob Godfrey; [email protected] Subject: RE: [amqp] Groups - AMQP Core Specification - Working Draft 4 uploaded My comments on the latest Working Draft: 1. Section 0.3 Acknowledgements a. Add Mr. Stanley Lewis (Progress Software) b. Add Ms. Kimberly Palko (Red Hat) c. Change affiliation of John O’Hara to Individual d. For reference, here is the roster http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/amqp/members/roster.php 2. Appendix A DTD is missing in the PDF document. Here are some comments from Chet (TC admin): 1. Add Revision History a. This could be a new section (0.4 Revision History) in Part 0: Overview chapter. Just a high-level history is sufficient. For example, a table with columns (Revision number, Revision date, Description of changes) and four rows each one corresponding to Working Draft 1 through 4. For example, the first row { Working Draft 1, <date>, <list of issues addressed> }. The revision history is useful for reviewers who have not been a part of the specification development and is particularly useful during public review. 2. Front page a. The HTML and PDF versions use different capitalizations for “This version”, “Previous version”, “Latest version”, “Additional artifacts”, “Related work”, “Citation format”. Suggest using the capitalizations as indicated above in both the PDF and HTML formats. b. Additional artifacts i. Suggest changing the list item “Appendix A: DTD” to “XML Document Type Definition (DTD)” and remove the prepend “Appendix A: ” From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Godfrey Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2012 1:41 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [amqp] Groups - AMQP Core Specification - Working Draft 4 uploaded Submitter's message The first upload of Working Draft 4 seemed to have come from a bad build, with some links trying to go to wd03 rather than wd04 - have uploaded a rebuilt version. I've not upped the version number as there have been no changes to the document in SVN, This is merely a rebuild. thanks to Dave (again) for pointing this out :-) Cheers, Rob -- Mr. Rob Godfrey Document Name : AMQP Core Specification - Working Draft 4 Description Updated from working draft 3 to correct the copyright date from 2011 to 2012 in the PDF file (First upload of WD04 seemed to have a bad build, with some links trying to go to wd03 rather than wd04 - have uploaded a rebuilt version) Download Latest Revision Public Download Link Submitter : Mr. Rob Godfrey Group : OASIS Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) TC Folder : Working Documents Date submitted : 2012-02-02 13:40:31 Revision : 1