amqp — archive

[Reminder] Proposed AMQP Technical Workshop

From: Rob Godfrey <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:31:00 -0000

I’ll be putting out a straw-man agenda on Monday based on all the feedback that I’ve got (both on and off the public list). For what it’s worth, I’m completely in agreement that we need to be focusing on areas that will help drive adoption. For me that means, 1) Conformance and documentation 2) Completing mappings to established messaging API standards (JMS, WCF) (and DTX fits here too in my mind, as it is “expected” by many users even if they really shouldn’t be using it) 3) Global Addressing/End-to-End security: the stuff that makes it possible to use AMQP across the internet I’m expecting that not everyone at the workshop will be focusing on the same thing; so 2 or three people may be talking about DTX, while four or five others go talk about SCTP, or OpenMAMA or something... Cheers, Rob From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Mueller Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 3:21 PM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [amqp] [Reminder] Proposed AMQP Technical Workshop Sure, less is more but there is at least one topic which must be done because it is Book 6 of the spec, distributed transactions. Am 09.03.2012 um 16:13 schrieb "Steve Huston" < [email protected] >: Right, I agree with Alexis that focusing is more likely to produce results over a short period of time. Examples and Docs is proving popular (since new interested people will want that to get going). I had assumed that Examples and Docs were to be aimed at developers… if so, the obvious follow-up is what API are we writing examples and docs for? Hence, my point to work on a C/C++ API. -Steve From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexis Richardson Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:41 AM To: Rafael Schloming Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [amqp] [Reminder] Proposed AMQP Technical Workshop Guys Just my 2c on this subject ... "Less is more". The intersection of what everyone wants is more likely to get done quickly, than a broad front of work. I think Examples & Docs is a biggy, as is Conformance. Following that I would pick Broker model(s) and mapping(s). alexis From: "Rafael Schloming" < [email protected] > To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, March 9, 2012 2:18:39 PM Subject: Re: [amqp] [Reminder] Proposed AMQP Technical Workshop From your list I'd have the following interests: * Filters (and other registries/extensions) * Federation / Global Addressing * End-to-end security (Message Encryption/Authentication) * Broker model / Management * Conformance testing * Generation of examples / technical documentation I'm not sure if this qualifies as a sub topic of conformance testing or not, but I'd also be interested in continuing the interop testing from the connectathons and perhaps building out a more automated version of it based on the demo done at the NY F2F. --Rafael On 03/08/2012 09:05 AM, Godfrey, Robert X wrote: Thanks to everybody who has responded publicly or to me directly. In order to pull together a proposal for topics/dates/venue we really need responses from *everybody* who would potentially attend by the end of this week. Thanks again, Rob From: Godfrey, Robert X Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 8:33 PM To: ' [email protected] '; [email protected] Subject: Proposed AMQP Technical Workshop All, The Member Section Action Group has been discussing ways in which the AMQP community can work together to drive forward adoption of AMQP 1.0. One proposal which we are looking to take forward is to hold a Technical Workshop for interested parties to discuss future technical work streams around the AMQP 1.0 Core Protocol. The suggestion is to hold a five day offsite (location and date to be decided) where proposals can be discussed, and ownership assigned, in line with the objectives that we have previously set ourselves for 2012. The topics to be covered, and daily schedule, will be agreed prior to the meeting so that parties who are interested only in a subset of the sessions can attend only those days which interest them. In order to gauge interest and determine which topics should be covered, we would request that interested members respond to this e-mail within the next week stating which work-streams they have interest in contributing to, and which dates/locations they could attend. Potential topics for discussion include * Filters (and other registries/extensions) * JMS Mapping * WCF Mapping * SOAP Mapping * AMQP 0-9-1/10 Mapping * SCTP binding * InfiniBand binding * In-memory binding * Websockets binding * Federation / Global Addressing * Distributed transactions * End-to-end security (Message Encryption/Authentication) * Broker model / Management * Conformance testing * Mapping AMQP to OpenMama, MQTT, STOMP * Generation of examples / technical documentation Potential locations might be: US/Canada West Coast; US East Coast; UK - London or North England/Scotland; Continental Europe (Germany?) or suggestions from anyone else willing to host Potential dates might be 26 th March - 20 th March (may be difficult to achieve due to timescales) 16 th April - 20 th April 23 rd April - 27 th April 30 th April - 4 th May (clashes with 1 st May Holiday in some countries) 7 th May - 11 th May (clashes with 7 th May Holiday in some countries) You should highlight up to four themes (including potentially new suggestions of your own) that you definitely want to participate in, and separately up to four sessions that you may participate in if they are running. Attendees at will be expected to have done work beforehand to craft their proposals in a form which can be distributed. The outcomes of the sessions will be presented to the member section after the completion of the Technical Workshop. Only work with sufficient interest, active contributors, and strong consensus amongst the participants will have the necessary momentum to succeed. As a reminder - In order that we may quickly determine interest levels and scope for such a technical workshop, we request all interested parties let us know of their availability, preferred topics and locations by 8 th March. Thanks in advance, Rob This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses, confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers, available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email . IIT Software GmbH Fahrenheitstr. 1, D28359 Bremen, Germany Tel: +49 421 2208-166, Fax: +49 421 2208-167 Amtsgericht Bremen, HRB 18624, Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andreas Mueller Steuernummer: 71/572/04100, VAT: DE199945912