amqp — archive

RE: Final(?) review of the Addressing doc

From: Clemens Vasters
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2020 14:34:00 -0000

https://github.com/oasis-tcs/amqp-specs/pull/11 From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Clemens Vasters Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 4:24 PM To: Rob Godfrey <[email protected]>; oasis-amqp-list <[email protected]> Subject: [amqp] RE: Final(?) review of the Addressing doc Both done. WD12 incoming. From: Rob Godfrey < [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 2:57 PM To: oasis-amqp-list < [email protected] >; Clemens Vasters < [email protected] > Subject: Final(?) review of the Addressing doc Hi all, took another look at the addressing draft this morning. In general all looks good, only two things worthy of comment Reviewing the latest addressing draft. 1. Need to update the references to related specs to Committee Spec or later versions 2. Section 2.3 : Scopes Scope identifiers follow DNS naming conventions, but they do not have to be registered in DNS and they don t have an associated IP address. They are just names describing logical realms in a system, and the DNS-like structure helps expressing hierarchical relationships. We should probably be explicit that one should only define a scope with the agreement of the registered owner of the DNS domain name -- Rob -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill