bdxr — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [bdxr-comment] Existing envelopes
Dear Ole
Once again thank you for your comment to the BDE PRD01. Thanks to your contribution the TC has analysed and discussed various differences between the BDE and SBDH. Our findings and conclusions have been added to the draft comment resolution log found here:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=55772&wg_abbrev=bdxr
An updated specification (work in progress) can be found here:
https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=55757&wg_abbrev=bdxr
The BDX TC expects to be able to announce a second public review of the draft BDE specification
during this month. In the meantime if you have any questions or further comments please let us know.
Best regards,
Kenneth
From: Ole Ellerbæk Madsen
Date: Friday, April 24, 2015 at 5:43 AM
To: " [email protected] "
Subject: [bdxr-comment] Existing envelopes
It should be analyzed whether there are functionality in existing envelopes that can not be mapped to BDE.
Best Regards
Ole Madsen
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]