bdxr — archive

[Kenneth Bengtsson]

Dear all While preparing for our meeting on Wednesday I identified some additional (purely editorial) issues with SMP 1.0 CSPRD02: 1) Section 2.3.3.2: The line numbering has not been reset, but continues the line numbering from 2.3.2.2. First line should be “01”. 2) Section 2.4.7.1: In the HTML version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.html) and PDF version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.pdf) , the pseudo-schema has line numbering (labelling the single line as line “04”). The normative (Word) version does not. 3) When we added section 3.2.1 we created a hanging paragraph in 3.2. 4) Section 3.2.1: In the HTML version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.html) and PDF version ( http://docs.oasis-open.org/bdxr/bdx-smp/v1.0/csprd02/bdx-smp-v1.0-csprd02.pdf) , the samples have line numbering (labelling the single lines “05” and “06” respectively). The normative (Word) version does not. 5) Section 3.4 has a hanging paragraph. 6) Appendix C3: Line numbering has not been reset, but continues the line numbering from the example in C2. First line should be “01”. 7) Appendix D (Revision History) should be labelled “non-normative” for consistency (or should be removed entirely, contemplating that the next Committee Specification will be SMP 1.0 Candidate OASIS Standard). I’m adding the above to a new comment resolution log document, which I will upload in a bit. Best regards, Kenneth