Re[3]: [cgmo-webcgm] RE intensity

[Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>]

Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 8:30:40 AM, Lofton wrote:

LH> At 12:34 AM 7/14/2004 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote:
>>Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 8:16:20 PM, Lofton wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>LH> That said, whether or not to say anything about clamping depends on what's
>>LH> the error philosophy -- the equations can only yield out-of-range results
>>LH> for illegal parameter values.
>>
>>Who said intensity had to be limited to [0,1]? :-)

LH> Forrest did, in his original proposal, which I thought you had endorsed as
LH> the way to go (I don't have the messages here on this system, to check it).

You are right, he did say that: "Where intensity has a value from 0 to
1 and the colors range from 0 to 0xffff."

But he also said: "If we are going the other way [meaning HLS] how do
you make red more intense, make it black?"

And to me, that last comment meant going above 1.  Any way, let's talk
and about this during the telecon.  I think we're close to a decision.

Regards,

-- 
 Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com