RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing

[Steve Anderson <sanderson@opennetwork.com>]

Yep.  Lack of positive response from the membership results in the vote failing to pass, and the status quo prevails.
--
Steve


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Kenton [mailto:jkenton@datapower.com]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Hal Lockhart
Cc: Steve Anderson; chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing


Hal Lockhart wrote:
> I like Steve's proposal.
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Steve Anderson [mailto:sanderson@opennetwork.com]
>>Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM
>>To: chairs@lists.oasis-open.org
>>Subject: RE: [chairs] Re: Quorum required for good standing
>>

    ...

>>  If we take this path, the replacement text would be:
>>
>>    "Email votes require majority of TC membership in order to pass."
>>

Note that a literal reading of this phrase makes deliberate abstentions equivalent to "NO" votes.

--- 
--------------------------
Jeff Kenton
DataPower Technology, Inc.