[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [chairs] News today on IBM patents and OASIS
Eduardo,
Understood.
I was just hoping that someone might be able to flush
this a little more out into the open for us!
Apparently more patience required.... ; -)
We will await some more formal outcomes in due
course.
Thanks, DW
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eduardo Gutentag" <Eduardo.Gutentag@Sun.COM>
To: "David Webber (XML)" <david@drrw.info>
Cc: "Chairs OASIS" <chairs@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [chairs] News today on IBM patents and OASIS
> David,
>
> that's from a week ago, 11 April.
>
> But more importantly than chronological accuracy, I fail now, as I
> failed a week ago, to see how this vague reference to a vague promise
> ("this month", "the company said", "free", no quote, no attribution, no
> date, no URL) can be construed, as others have done, as having anything
> to do with OASIS IPR policy. If that promise has indeed been made (and
> I'm not saying it's impossible for it to have been made, I'm only saying
> that I've not seen it be made other than this NYT reference) then all it
> means is that someone at IBM is talking RF, which is most welcome, but
> without specifying whether it's RF on RAND Terms or RF on Limited Terms.
> And without that qualification, any further speculation is just that.
>
> On 04/16/2005 07:17 AM, David Webber (XML) wrote:
> > See todays' NYT for an important development from IBM.
> >
> >
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/11/technology/11ibm.html?pagewanted=2&en=d2b
> >
> > I find this most welcome - and the article contains many insights
> > particularly on Page 2.
> >
> > There is clearly much more to be done here - including possible fine
tuning
> > of the
> > draft IPR policies to directly encourage others to follow IBM's ground
> > breaking
> > lead here?
> >
> > And for OASIS to influence these moves that are afoot worldwide so that
> > implementers of OASIS specifications can do so in confidence and in a
> > spirit of true open collaboration for the benefit of the industry.
> >
> > Obviously we will have more opportunity to discuss this in New Orleans!
> >
> > DW
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >>Dear colleagues,
> >>
> >>This morning I was delighted to read in the New York Times that IBM has
> >>committed "all of its future patent contributions to the largest
standards
> >>group for electronic commerce on the Web, the Organization for the
> >>Advancement of Structured Information Standards, would be free." [1]
> >>
> >>
> >>[1]
> >>
> >
> >
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/11/technology/11ibm.html?ex=1113883200&en=d2b
> >
> >>df8df8eca625c&ei=5070
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Eduardo Gutentag | e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
> Corporate Standards | Phone: +1 510 550 4616 (internal
x31442)
> Sun Microsystems Inc. | W3C AC Rep / W3C AB / OASIS BoD
>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]