OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  codelist  ·  2007-04

codelist — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Dissenting argument on namespace URI


Thanks, Robin. Maybe you could help me in understanding the OASIS namespace URI guidelines http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/namingGuidelines/resourceNamingV07.html#NamespaceDesign a little better. In particular the section ---- TCs should avoid creating collision/confusion and semantic overloading at the point of a XML Namespace URI which could be mistaken for a regular directory URI, or vice versa; thus, for any Type 1 or Type 3 HTTP scheme namespace URI terminating in foo or foo/ (e.g., http://http://docs.oasis-open.org/tcName/path/foo), no URIs should be created for resources matching "*" in http://http://docs.oasis-open.org/tcName/path/foo/*. IOW: we don't put any content in directory foo/. ---- I understood this to mean that if the genericode 1.0 namespace URI is http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/1.0/ that we can't have any documents whose access URI is of the form http://docs.oasis-open.org/codelist/genericode/1.0/* However, this is not consistent with the first two of the RDDL examples that you posted http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsmc/200702 http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200702 where there are documents in the directory of the namespace URI. Am I missing something obvious? Thanks, Cheers, Tony. On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:36:16 +0100, Robin Cover

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]