Moved to Working Draft: Timestamp and Timestamp Precision

["Wunder, John A." <jwunder@mitre.org>]

All,

Based on the lack of dissent against the motion to accept the timestamp and timestamp precision properties by unanimous consent, I’ll be updating them in the pre-draft specification to indicate that they’re now in “working draft” status.

There are currently two open ballots to move other text forward to working draft status:

• Identifier, closing 5/17
• Custom Properties, closing 5/20

Please vote!

Also note a slight language tweak…where before we were using “draft”, I’m going to start using the term “working draft” to avoid terminology conflicts with the OASIS official concept of a draft. Same idea though…things that are approved as working draft have received consensus and any substantive changes will require another approved motion to accept those changes.

Thanks,

John