dita — archive

RE: [dita] Last call for top DITA issues

From: Paul Grosso
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:17:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [dita] Last call for top DITA issues




From: "Grosso, Paul" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:18:17 -0500









I don't have any input on glossaries, but I'd 
just
like to cast another vote for minimalism.  
I've
always thought we should do more frequent, 
smaller
releases of standards.  The whole enchilda 
mentality
of standards too often ends up with still too 
little,
and way too late.
 
paul



  
  
  From: Paul Prescod 
  [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, 2006 February 
  20 12:59
To: Erik Hennum; Esrig, Bruce (Bruce)
Cc: 
  [email protected]
Subject: RE: [dita] Last call for top DITA 
  issues


  
  Guys: As self-appointed group minimalist I would argue 
  that we should defer the glossaries. 
   
   * there seem to be many open questions 
  
   * glossaries can be authored "by 
  hand"
   * multi-use glossaries can be created with 
  conditional text and conref
   * we can't do everything at 
once
   
  Other 
opinions?












[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]