dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [dita] Book title in bookmap
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->dita message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Book title in bookmap
- From: "Farwell, Kevin" <[email protected]>
- To: "Robert D Anderson" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 11:35:46 -0400
Hello, I'd vote for option 1. I'm not in favor of having any translatable content in the book map. That just makes one more file to translate, one more place to manage terminology, one more file to version, and one more place mistakes can be made. If the book file is only a collection of references to external content, the efficiency of the map is preserved. The conflict is unavoidable. People using book maps now, with their titles in attributes, will have to rework their files either way. Kevin
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]