dita — archive

Re: [dita] Proposed changes to the xml:lang proposal

From: Robert Stayton
To: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 23:21:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [dita] Proposed changes to the xml:lang proposal




From: "Bob Stayton" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 16:23:29 -0700






And what about Paul's message regarding conref and xml:lang:

http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200604/msg00018.html

I think another sentence should describe the specification of 
conref and xml:lang.  Something like:

"In the case of conref, the xml:lang of the transcluded content 
is that attached to a referent element or to its most direct 
ancestor containing an xml:lang in the referent document. If 
there is no such attribute then the xml:lang is taken from the 
conref element or its most recent ancestor with an xml:lang 
attribute."

Bob Stayton
Sagehill Enterprises
DocBook Consulting
[email protected]