dita — archive

Re: [dita] Proposed changes to the xml:lang proposal

From: Eliot Kimber
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:08:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















dita message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [dita] Proposed changes to the xml:lang proposal




From: "Eliot Kimber" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:11:03 -0500






Grosso, Paul wrote:
> That is why I think saying "the language...should be indicated
> via markup" is misleading, because is the string itself (as
> well as its language) that needs to be indicated via markup.

And just to be a bit more pedantic, I think it would be clearer and more 
accurate to say "text" instead of "string".

While the XML data is held as strings of characters, semantically when 
you talk about *language" you are dealing with "text" rather than 
strings of characters.

I would think that the clearest statement would be something like:

"As a matter of practice, text that is in a language different from the 
base language of its container should be contained in XML markup that 
uses the xml:lang= attribute to indicate the text's national language."

Cheers,

Eliot

-- 
W. Eliot Kimber
Professional Services
Innodata Isogen
9390 Research Blvd, #410
Austin, TX 78759
(512) 372-8841

[email protected]
www.innodata-isogen.com







Follow-Ups:

RE: [dita] Proposed changes to the xml:lang proposal
From: "Gershon L Joseph" <[email protected]>



References:

RE: [dita] Proposed changes to the xml:lang proposal
From: "Grosso, Paul" <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]