dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [dita] Proposal: Update foreign topic to include processing info for generalization/specialization use case
Robert and Paul,
I would support this proposal. If we go with this approach, can we
avoid saying that all processors should hide foreign content as an
external object in the specification? I agree with Paul that this level
of detail about processing behaviour does not need to be codified in the
spec.
One suggestion is that we define "generalization" as a process that
produces standard DITA topics from specialized topics.
This could
allow different implementations of processing when it comes to deciding
what should be done with foreign vocabularies and defines a measurable
benchmark.
Best regards,
Yas Etessam
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]