dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Groups - DITA TC Meeting (Conference Call) modified
Sorry I had a conflict and couldn't make it this week.
RF on Limited Terms is our preference as well.
I'm prepared to vote Yes on that at any time.
--Dana
Michael Priestley wrote:
Minutes taken by Michael Priestley 2006/11/14
> Approve minutes from previous business meeting:
> * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200610/msg00079.html (24 Oct)
Approved with amendments -Don moves, Scott Hudson seconds, no objections.
Amendment: Item 3 Action Item
From Don Day:
For the action on the foreign element discussion, I propose this amendment:
ACTION: Eric Sirois to provide an updated example and brief discussion on
using the class attribute with foreign attributes; to be incorporated as an
example into the spec topic for the <foreign> element.
Amendment: Item 4 correction:
From Paul Grosso:
Clarification to the minutes:
Instead of "from text to data", we are removing the "#FIXED"
indication from the (already CDATA) DITAArchVersion attribute.
More precisely, I'd phrase the decision as follows:
DECISION: Robert moves to remove the "#FIXED" indication from
the DITAArchVersion attribute and to include version-specific
FPIs (formal public identifiers) in the catalog. Scott
seconds. No objections.
>
> 1. ITEM: Follow up on "Use of standardized prefixes when
> incorporating foreign vocabularies"
> * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200610/msg00021.html
Eric Sirois: outcome is explanation of class attribute on foreign element, lack of class attributes on contained elements.
Action: Eric to provide clarified text for foreign specialization topic - use of class attributes on non-DITA content
Action: Robert Anderson to provide text on foreign content generalization - moving content into sidefile, reincluding on respecialization
>
> 2. ITEM: metadata behaviour in maps
> * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200610/msg00012.html
Robert proposes to add table to architectural spec. Michael Priestley seconds. No objections.
>
> 3. ITEM: Ongoing review of 1.1 drafts:
> * Action: Robert to post recommendation
> * http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200611/msg00007.html
Action: Don Day and Michael Priestley to publish updated drafts with comments/feedback incorporated
Discussion: some good experiences with bookmap so far. Implementations proceeding.
>
> 4. ITEM: Translation best practices
> * Best Practice for Indexing DITA topics
> * Best Practice for Translation Memory (link?)
Deferring discussion till next week.
Action: Gershon to upload best practice for translation memory document for discussion/review
Action: TC members to review indexing best practices document for next week's meeting
>
> 5. ITEM: Split domains from DITA 1.1 core
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200611/msg00003.html (Kravogel)
>
After discussion, deferred to 1.2 - but suggested that toolkit could provide starter topic doctype (incorporating topic.mod with basic domains only - eg highlighting and utilities and indexing) in the meantime
>
>Deferred until actions completed
> Outcome of Kravogel telecon on Nested Sections
> IPR Transition
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/200610/msg00075.html (request from Mary McRae)
Paul Grosso: Proposed that we use RF on limited terms.
Sharon Veach seconded, no objection.
Note this may not be sufficient for a transition, given:
Approval of a Transition Approval Ballot requires i) a minimum of 50% of all TC Qualified Members to vote, ii) no NO votes cast and iii) one or more YES votes. (from the OASIS IPR Policy FAQ at http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/transition_faq.php )
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]