dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: latest 1.1 XSDs
Hi Paul,
The redefine was purposefully left like that so as not to break existing
specialization when the base DITA 1.0 schema were switched
for the DITA 1.1 schemas.
The commonElementGrp.xsd is included in the
topicGrp.xsd so the parser should not be returning an error.
Which XML parser are you using? I've tried validation with Xerces and XSV.
Neither of them returned errors. I haven't tried SaxonSA.
I know there are also some validation issues with some of the MS XML
parser.
Eric
Eric A. Sirois
Staff Software Developer
DB2 Universal Database - Information Development
DITA Migration and Tools Development
IBM Canada Ltd. - Toronto Software Lab
Email: [email protected]
Blue Pages (Internal)
"Transparency and accessibility requirements dictate that public
information and government
transactions avoid depending on technologies that imply or impose a
specific product or
platform on businesses or citizens" - EU on XML-based office document
formats.
"Grosso, Paul"
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]