dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Action: Updating conformance statement (Kimber, due 1 September 2009)
Elliot, sounds as if we need to discuss this. Off the topic of my head,
here's what I would suggest:
Overview [Unique for each of the three packages/document variations]
Conformance statement
Architectural Specification
Language Reference
This keeps "Introduction to DITA" as a component of the architectural
specification.
Kris
ekimber wrote:
> I have made a pass over the conformance statement and updated the file in
> SVN. Need to work out where it should go in the overall structure--have
> provided a proposal to Kristen Eberlein. My current thinking is that it
> should follow the Introduction to DITA section, where that section and the
> Conformance sections are then peers to the Arch Spec and Lang Ref, e.g.:
>
> - About the DITA 1.2 Spec
> - Introduction to DITA
> - Conformance
> - Architectural Specification
>
- DITA Markup
>
- DITA Processing
>
- Specialization
>
- Customization
> - Language Reference
>
> I reviewed the OASIS document on writing conformance specs. I'm not
> completely happy with our current conformance spec in terms of its
> organization but I think it's good enough for 1.2.
>
> We still need to make as much of a pass as we can over the lang ref to add
> the appropriate conformance level for specific behaviors described therein.
> This is no small undertaking, I realize, but it needs to be done if the
> conformance clause is to have much meaning.
>
> At a minimum, if people can comment on that aspect of the language spec as
> they are reviewing it we can try to implement the non-controversial comments
> during the upcoming review period. Even creating a list of those topics that
> don't need to be examined would help: there are 534 topics in the langref at
> present. If we can narrow that down to say 50 that require updated
> conformance language, that would make the task tractable (that's only 8
> hours at 10 minutes a topic :-).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eliot
>
> ----
> Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc.
> email: [email protected]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]