OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  dita  ·  2009-09

dita — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Action: Updating conformance statement (Kimber, due 1 September 2009)


Elliot, sounds as if we need to discuss this. Off the topic of my head, here's what I would suggest: Overview [Unique for each of the three packages/document variations] Conformance statement Architectural Specification Language Reference This keeps "Introduction to DITA" as a component of the architectural specification. Kris ekimber wrote: > I have made a pass over the conformance statement and updated the file in > SVN. Need to work out where it should go in the overall structure--have > provided a proposal to Kristen Eberlein. My current thinking is that it > should follow the Introduction to DITA section, where that section and the > Conformance sections are then peers to the Arch Spec and Lang Ref, e.g.: > > - About the DITA 1.2 Spec > - Introduction to DITA > - Conformance > - Architectural Specification > - DITA Markup > - DITA Processing > - Specialization > - Customization > - Language Reference > > I reviewed the OASIS document on writing conformance specs. I'm not > completely happy with our current conformance spec in terms of its > organization but I think it's good enough for 1.2. > > We still need to make as much of a pass as we can over the lang ref to add > the appropriate conformance level for specific behaviors described therein. > This is no small undertaking, I realize, but it needs to be done if the > conformance clause is to have much meaning. > > At a minimum, if people can comment on that aspect of the language spec as > they are reviewing it we can try to implement the non-controversial comments > during the upcoming review period. Even creating a list of those topics that > don't need to be examined would help: there are 534 topics in the langref at > present. If we can narrow that down to say 50 that require updated > conformance language, that would make the task tractable (that's only 8 > hours at 10 minutes a topic :-). > > Cheers, > > Eliot > > ---- > Eliot Kimber | Senior Solutions Architect | Really Strategies, Inc. > email: [email protected]

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]