dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
DITA Task model
To levelset - Andrzej, are you really proposing this for DITA 1.2? We've spent two years getting to this stage of development and documentation - do we want to hit the reset button?
I support the idea of a simple-DITA proposal for 1.3. I have zero confidence in its readiness or appropriateness for 1.2.
Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Lead IBM DITA Architect
[email protected]
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
| From: | "Bruce Nevin (bnevin)" <[email protected]> |
| To: | "Andrzej Zydron" <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> |
| Cc: | "Joann Hackos" <[email protected]>, "DITA TC" <[email protected]> |
| Date: | 09/24/2009 02:02 PM |
| Subject: | RE: [dita] DITA Task model |
Andrej,
You refer to your June 2008 exchange with Michael at
http://tinyurl.com/ycz87lt, where you summarized your proposal thus:
>... a definitive subset of DITA, let's call
>it for argument's sake EDEN (Electronic Documentumentation Essential
>Norm) .... EDEN would be a completely
>valid DITA form but would not allow the following constructs:
>
>1) Recursive elements - no recursion
>2) Block spanning elements - only inline elements allowed within block
>elements
>3) Conrefs - replaced by xrefs for linguistically complete phrases or
>sentences
>4) Specialization past the basic Topic, Concept, Task and Reference -
no
>specialization
I'll remind the BusDocs team of this for its relevance to the proposal
under review there.
/Bruce
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]