dita — archive

[Bruce Nevin]

Eliot, it's awfully good of you not to take umbrage at the implication that your writing is unclear. That was an unintended side effect of the main point about accuracy in the reader depending on readability in addition to depending on accuracy in the writer. And the fundamental purpose of the topic I wrote (now under review) was to provide an overview with all the detailed topics about keys, conref, etc. accessible from that one place by means of related-links. It was only in conversation with you that we decided to merge it with the conref topic conref.dita which you had written. So this is to set the record straight, clear your good name as a writer, apologize for the unintended slur, and thank you for your gracious response. /Bruce >