dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Explicit Prohibition on Nested Tables?
I don't think we should add anything discouraging about nested tables.
Users clearly want it, many if not most of the tools support it, and the markup allows it.
Let's leave this one be.
Chris Chris Nitchie (734) 330-2978 [email protected] www.oberontech.com < http://www.oberontech.com/
> Follow us: < https://www.facebook.com/oberontech > < https://twitter.com/oberontech > < http://www.linkedin.com/company/oberon-technologies
> On 1/16/15, 1:54 PM, "Tom Magliery" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I don't imagine that the writer of that comment on the forum was thinking
>in terms of the specifics of the OASIS CALS Exchange spec, but more
>likely in terms of whether the DITA OT supports it (it does), or perhaps
>another authoring tool (XMetaL does). >
>I can't speak to DITA's original intent, but I know plenty of XMetaL
>customers do use nested tables by the technique you mentioned (block
>element wrapper). >
>mag > > > > >
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]