dita — archive

Re: [dita] L&T diagrams

From: Kristen Eberlein <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:40:00 -0000

We also have to be careful to not make material changes. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype) On 7/24/2015 5:38 PM, Hackos, Joann wrote: Hi Tom, I think John Hunt ought to take a look at these. I believe he created them originally since they go way back to the original L&T design work. I would also ask Mark Meyer to take a look since we now have a new learning map structure. JoAnn JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD President Comtech Services Inc. 710 Kipling Street, Suite 400 Denver, CO 80215 [email protected] 303-232-7586 We will be hosting the CIDM Online Conference on July 29, 2015 More information is available: https://forum.infomanagementcenter.com From: Tom Magliery < [email protected] > Date: Friday, July 24, 2015 at 3:09 PM To: DITA TC < [email protected] > Subject: [dita] L&T diagrams I'd like to hear (perhaps off-list) from someone intimately familiar with the content and the two diagrams in this portion of the DITA spec: 2.8.3 A learning objects approach to learning and training content http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csprd01/part3-all-inclusive/archSpec/learningTraining/lc_spec_Overview_assumptions.html I'm working on prettying up the graphics throughout the spec, and I don't know enough about this content to know how much leeway I might have on these two diagrams. My questions are along the lines of: Are any apparent grammatical inconsistencies actually significant terminology? Can any text change without substantively changing the diagram? Are aspects of the layout (such as the shapes and arrangements of objects) significant to someone in this domain of expertise? Thanks, mag