dita — archive

Allowed locations for

From: Scott Hudson
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 16:42:00 -0000

Here is a list of the elements that example could be contained by (by scenario): <example> akin to <fig>: <abstract> , <body> , <bodydiv> , <dd> , <div> , <draft-comment> , <entry> , <example> , <fn> , <itemgroup> , <li> , <lq> , <note> , <p> , <section> , <sectiondiv> , <stentry> <pd> <conbody> add @type="example" to <note>: <abstract> , <body> , <bodydiv> , <dd> , <desc> , <div> , <draft-comment> , <entry> , <example> , <fig> , <figgroup> , <fn> , <itemgroup> , <li> , <linkinfo> , <lq> , <p> , <section> , <sectiondiv> , <stentry> <equation-figure> , <pd> <conbody> <example> akin to <div>: <abstract> , <body> , <bodydiv> , <dd> , <desc> , <div> , <draft-comment> , <entry> , <example> , <fig> , <figgroup> , <fn> , <itemgroup> , <li> , <linkinfo> , <lq> , <note> , <p> , <section> , <sectiondiv> , <stentry> <equation-figure> , <pd> <conbody> <example> today: <body> , <conbody> , <conbodydiv> , <refbody> , <refbodydiv> , <taskbody> I'm not seeing a lot of location differences between the proposed options. I'd still prefer to have <example> available in these locations, and prefer the actual element to adding a note @type. For the Stage 1 proposal, I'm not suggesting that we change <example> to be specialized from <fig> or <div>, but add it to the same locations, keeping the existing locations where it is allowed today. The content model of example would remain the same as well. Thanks and best regards, --Scott Scott Hudson Content Technology Strategist, DS&A Information and Knowledge Services Jeppesen, A Boeing Company 55 Inverness Drive East Englewood, CO 80112 303-328-6228 Cell: 303-350-7934 http://www.jeppesen.com