dita — archive

[Alan Houser]

Sure, but the multimedia domain is intended to be compatible with DITA 1.3, no? And we will publish the multimedia domain as a committee note? Or is this review specific to the DITA 2.0 spec? On 7/30/19 10:08 PM, Kristen James Eberlein wrote: Hi, Alan. <fallback> is not in DITA 1.3. It is in DITA 2.0, but in the base -- not part of the multimedia domain. Look in the PDFs of the DITA 2.0 draft spec. Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com +1 919 622-1501; kriseberlein (skype) On 7/30/2019 10:05 PM, Alan Houser wrote: Perhaps I'm missing something, but I see no mention of <fallback> in the 1.3 spec w/errata. Nor does it appear in the "All DITA elements, A to Z" topic -- http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/dita-v1.3-part3-all-inclusive.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/errata02/os/complete/part3-all-inclusive/langRef/quick-reference/all-elements-a-to-z.html#alldita1.2element_a_to_z This observation motivated my DITAweb comment. -Alan On 7/30/19 7:02 PM, Kristen James Eberlein wrote: Absence of a <fallback> topic -- <fallback> is part of the base and not the multimedia domain! -- Alan Houser Group Wellesley, Inc. Consultant and Trainer, Technical Publishing arh on Twitter 412-450-0532