dita — archive

Re: [dita] Questions regarding âthings you pressâ

From: Eliot Kimber
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 03:45:00 -0000

For question 2, migration, I would say that no migration is required. So far migration has focus on changes that are required in order to make existing documents or grammars conforming with 2.0. Anything else I think falls under the category of "this is new, you might want to use it", which is covered by the "new in this version" information we always provide. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber http://contrext.com ïOn 9/9/19, 7:20 PM, "Zoe Lawson" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: I m still working through the second stage proposal for things you press. Original email https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201906/msg00033.html draft proposal here: http://tools.oasis-open.org/version-control/browse/wsvn/dita/trunk/DITA-2.0/stage-2/Issue257-thingToPress.dita As I m working through some of the review comments on the stage two proposal, I m coming across bigger questions. 1. Where to put it. I m contemplating dumping it in the software domain, but that doesn t feel overly correct. Should there be a hardware domain? (Would the hazard stuff fit into it? Are there other things to go in? I don t have hardware experience to guess.) 2. Migration theories. If you have a new element that could replace existing elements but don t have to, what do we want to recommend? You can, this is how, but you don t have to? Thanks, ZoÃ