dita — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Comment in review of DITAVAL elements
We currently have the following content in both the <prop> and <revprop> topics.
Note the content highlighted in yellow in the screen capture: We have the following commentary in the DITAweb review: Do we still want to be limited to the XSL 1.1 specification?
zlawson updated comment 21/3/2022 01:55:57 Hmm ...
I added the link text to the xref element.
The URL might still be what was first specified for DITA 1.1 in 2007.
@Robert?
Do we want to make a change here?
The latest release of XSLT is XSLT 3.0 from 2017, but I'm not sure about XSL specifically.
We potentially could: Update the cross reference to point to a newer version of XSL spec (although I don't know if there have been changes for the color element.) Leave the current cross reference as-is Simply list the colors listed in the XSL 1.1 spec: aqua, black, blue, fuchsia, gray, green, lime, maroon, navy, olive, purple, red, silver, teal, white, and yellow ---- Marking this as REFERRED, and sending e-mail to the TC asking for a volunteer to do the research on this item.
keberlein updated comment 21/3/2022 17:56:17 Can I get a volunteer to do the necessary research on the XSL specs?
Kris
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]