dita — archive

RE: Action Item: additional normative and non-normative references

From: Kristen Eberlein
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 15:24:00 -0000

Thanks, Eliot. I’ve updated the spec content. We’ll need to get OASIS staff to review the format for the following references: ANSI document HTML5 Unicode Bidirectional Algorithm Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Owner, Eberlein Consulting LLC [email protected] Skype: kriseberlein; voice: +1 (919) 622-1501 From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Eliot Kimber Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2022 5:24 PM To: dita <[email protected]> Subject: [dita] Action Item: additional normative and non-normative references Make a pass over the current state of the DITA 2.0 spec looking for any mentions of things for which there is something like a standard that governs it. I did not identify any additional normative references, which is not a surprise since very little beyond the use of XML and URIs is normative by reference in DITA. I identified the following specifications that should probably be added to the non-normative list: XSLT3: XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 3.0 , Michael Kay, Editor. World Wide Web Consortium, 7 February 2017. This version is https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/CR-xslt-30-20170207/ . The latest version is available at https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/ . HTML5: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/ , HTML Living Standard WCAT: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/ UNICODE BIDIRECTIONAL ALGORITHM, https://www.unicode.org/reports/tr9/ HTML5 definition of the @dir attribute (to replace HTML 4.01 specification cited in current spec): https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/dom.html#the-dir-attribute Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) 1.1 (Second Edition), https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/ . (There is an SVG 2 candidate recommendation, published October, 2018, but it appears to be unlikely to ever make it to Recommendation status.) ANSI Z535.6-2011 (R2017), Product Safety Information In Product Manuals, Instructions And Other Collateral Materials Note that HTML5 is a slippery beast as it’s no longer a W3C specification (the W3C formally agreed to participate in the WHATWG to contribute to HTML 5 development) and there’s no single thing to cite except the WHATWG web site itself, which is what I’ve done here. All other forms of HTML appear to be effectively obsolete from a standards standpoint since the only thing that really matters is what browsers implement, which means what the WHATWG documents. Cheers, E. _____________________________________________ Eliot Kimber Sr Staff Content Engineer O: 512 554 9368 M: 512 554 9368 servicenow.com LinkedIn Twitter YouTube Facebook