dita — archive

Re: Scoped Keys and Relationship Tables: I Think We Need to Say Something in the Spec

From: Kristen Eberlein <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 20:13:00 -0000

I built a sample set using Eliot’s suggested root map, and it is attached. It has the following directory structure: rootmap.ditamap topic-01.dita submap-01 ---- submap-01.ditamap ---- submap-02.ditamap ---- topic-01.dita ---- topic-02.dita ---- topic-03.dita ---- topic-03.dita Here’s how I would expect the links to be resolved: Links generated: A reciprocal link between topic-01.dita and submap-01/topic-02.dita. Note that sub01.topic-02 and sub01.topic-02 both resolve to topic-02.dita. Submap-01 Links generated: A reciprocal link between submap-01/topic-02.dita and submap-01/submap-03.dita Submap-02 Links generated: None. No key definition for “topic-03” exists in keyscope “sub02”. Total effective links for the root map: A reciprocal link between topic-01.dita and submap-01/topic-02.dita A reciprocal link between submap-01/topic-02.dita and submap-01/submap-03.dita What am I missing? Or does the markup in your sample map need to be modified so that <topicref keyref=”sub01.topic-02/> and <topicref keyref=”sub02.topic-02/> resolve to different DITA topics? Best, Kris Kristen James Eberlein Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee Owner, Eberlein Consulting LLC [email protected] Skype: kriseberlein; voice: +1 (919) 622-1501 Attachment: root-map.zip Description: root-map.zip