dita — archive

[Stanley Doherty]

Hi -- I had an action item from last week to develop a troubleshooting example that: a. Made use of the DITA 2.0 troubleshooting grammar. b. Followed the traditional troubleshooting workflow of: <condition> - symptom description <diagnostics> - how to collect relevant info <cause> - root cause analysis <remedy> - probable fixes The DITA 2.0 troubleshooting grammar subordinates <cause> and <remedy> under <troubleSolution>. <condition> - symptom description <diagnostics> - how to collect relevant info <troubleSolution> <cause> - root cause analysis <remedy> - probable fixes </troubleSolution> I cannot develop an example where <condition>, <diagnostics>, <cause>, and <remedy> are workflow peers. At this point, I recommend going with the example currently in the spec.