Re: should simplesect be chunked?

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org> writes:

> since <simplesect> does not have a section number (i.e., its <title>
> if formatted as is, "My title", by if I replace <simplesect> with
> <section>, I get "1.3.5.7 My title"), I view <simplesect> as a
> <formalpara> with multiple sub-<paras>, not as a <section> with no
> sub-<section>s.

It's possible that we should add some ability to control section
numbering on non-simplesect elements.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | Everything we love, no doubt, will
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | pass away, perhaps tomorrow,
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | perhaps a thousand years hence.
                                   | Neither it nor our love for it is
                                   | any the less valuable for that
                                   | reason.--John Passmore

PGP signature