dss-x — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [dss-x] RE: Some more thoughts concerning the legal aspects
Detlef,
> is there a legal foundation for having a revision period, which
> must be several hours?
The german sig law in Section 17 says :
>> (2) The presentation of data to be signed requires
>> signature-application components that will first clearly indicate the
>> production of a qualified electronic signature and enable the data to
which the signature refers to be identified.<<
( see http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/3612.pdf )
The word 'first' is interpreted in a way that the certificate owner must
be aware _beforehand_ of a qualified signature creation. One usual way
to fulfil this requirement is to implement a time frame where signing
requests may be reviewed. This is a way to NOT require an explicit click
for each and every signature.
But indeed, afaik there are no explicit time frames given. It's just a
traditional way to fulfil the legal requirements and to comply with the
idea that our regulatory body recognizes as best practices.
Hope this helps ...
Andreas
___________________________________________________
Andreas Kühne
phone: +49 177 293 24 97
mailto: [email protected]
Trustable Ltd.
Niederlassung Deutschland
Ströverstr. 18 - 59427 Unna
Amtsgericht Hamm HRB 5868
Directors
Andreas Kühne
Heiko Veit
Company UK
Company No: 5218868
Registered in England and Wales
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]