OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  dss-x  ·  2008-07

dss-x — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Groups - 1st working draft for multi-signature verification reports profile =?UTF-8?B?KDIwMDhfMDVfMDVfb2FzaXMtZHNzLXByb2ZpbGUtZm9yLWNvbXByZWhlbnNp?= =?UTF-8?B?dmUtc2lnbmF0dXJlLXZlcmlmaWNhdGlvbi1yZ


Hi Ezer, > > I think that is a good point that there are additional > information needed to be included in the multi-signature > report profile. I mentioned that in the draft of the Visual > Signature profile. > The question is whether to include this additional > information in the multi-signature report or in the visual > signature profile. > I think that it makes more sense to mention elements such as > field name and reason in the visual signature profile as an > extension to the multi-signature report. (I'm not sure how > formally and technically this can be achieved though...) as the verification report profile already has different conformance levels ("basic" and "advanced") I would prefer not to introduce more levels by profiling this profile, but the "advanced" level should cover everything, which is necessary to support the different signature formats. Concerning the SignaturePtr-structure we could easily add the FieldName attribute. What do you think about the potential mapping of the PDF.Reason-element to the XAdES.CommitmentTypeIndication-element (cf. XAdES, v1.3.2, Section 7.2.6)? BR, Detlef > > Regards, > Ezer > >

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]