dss-x — archive

[System <stefan@drees.name>]

Hello Martin, as additional hint for a workaround: The AdES profile "Advanced Electronic Signature Profiles of the OASIS Digital Signature Service Version 1.0" (http://docs.oasis-open.org/dss/v1.0/oasis-dss-profiles-AdES-spec-v1.0-os.html) currently only applies to XAdES and CAdES, **but** as the AdES URI's are often used for PAdES (as well in commercial products) to be able to specify what type of PAdES is required, in the meantime this is a possible work-around. Hope this helps, Stefan. Am 18.11.13 13:28, schrieb Stefan Drees: > Hello Martin, > > sorry for answering now and not earlier, but discussions profit from > taking some time :-) > > > The TC has discussed the matter and in the meantime has analyzed, that > either the DSS core specification must be ammended with an additional > section on PDF signatures (as well as the AdES profile) or a new PAdES > profile must be created. > > > I hope this helps. I will answer Thomas' mail along the same lines just > to make sure all dsicussion threads are in sync. > > All the best, > Stefan. > > Am 07.10.13 01:20, schrieb Martin Boßlet: >> Hello Stefan, >> >> was it possible to discuss PAdES integration during the last >> conference call? >> >> Thanks a lot in advance, >> Martin >> >> 2013/8/27 Stefan Drees <stefan@drees.name>: >>> Hello Martin, >>> >>> au contraire, we are sorry to not have answered earlier. >>> >>> We are in the midst of a summer break with the committee activities. >>> >>> The next conference call is September, 9th from 1800 CEST when we will >>> discuss your comments, suggestsions and questions. >>> >>> All the best and again sorry for not responding earlier. >>> >>> Stefan Drees >>> Co-Chair of DSS-X >>> >>> Am 24.08.13 00:25, schrieb Martin Boßlet: >>> >>>> Hello Juan, hello Stefan, >>>> >>>> sorry for addressing you directly! I sent a mail (included at the end >>>> for reference) to the old dss-dev mailing list a few weeks ago, but >>>> never heard back. I'm afraid the mailing list might no longer be >>>> active and therefore I wanted to try this way. I apologize in advance >>>> if there actually is a well-suited mailing list that I could have >>>> addressed instead - if so, please tell me, I'd be happy to re-post my >>>> question there. Otherwise, I would greatly appreciate any comments or >>>> suggestions! >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance, >>>> Martin Boßlet >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Martin Boßlet <martin.bosslet@gmail.com> >>>> Date: 2013/8/3 >>>> Subject: DSS and PAdES >>>> To: dss-dev@lists.oasis-open.org >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I am interested in best practices/guidelines for supporting PDF and, >>>> more specifically, PAdES signatures using DSS. I found this message >>>> [1] in the archives which pointed to the DSS-X TC. DSS-X introduced >>>> the visible signature profile, which is a great addition with respect >>>> to PDF signing using DSS, but as far as I understood the DSS-X TC has >>>> not revised the abstract DSS Core profile in the sense that explicit >>>> support for PDF/PAdES signatures would have been added. >>>> >>>> I was wondering if some publicly available guidelines or best >>>> practices exist for using DSS in combination with PDF/PAdES >>>> signatures? Are there any plans to augment the Core profile? While it >>>> is certainly possible to use it already, explicit support would >>>> probably foster interoperability between different solutions. Right >>>> now, full PAdES support would probably require an additional concrete >>>> profile, which currently would most likely be solution-specific. >>>> >>>> Thanks a lot in advance for your help and comments, >>>> Martin Boßlet >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dss-dev/200707/msg00000.html >>>> >>> >