ebxml-msg — archive

Re: revised-ebMS V1.01 Editorial changes

From: System
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 17:44:00 -0000

Colleen, Regarding the original TRP Requirements spec: Since the TRP requirements spec has not been kept up to date, I believe that the answer is that you don't mention it or reference it. You could put it on the team's OASIS page for reference by team members but it isn't something that will be of interest to users of the spec, especially if it is not updated. Regards, Marty ************************************************************************************* Martin W. Sachs IBM T. J. Watson Research Center P. O. B. 704 Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 914-784-7287; IBM tie line 863-7287 Notes address: Martin W Sachs/Watson/IBM Internet address: mwsachs @ us.ibm.com ************************************************************************************* Colleen Evans <[email protected]> on 09/25/2001 05:31:04 PM To: Arvola Chan <[email protected]> cc: ebXML Msg <[email protected]> Subject: Re: revised-ebMS V1.01 Editorial changes Arvola, Thanks for the quick feedback.� Comments inline. Colleen Arvola Chan wrote: Colleen: Here is some feedback on the V1.01 editorial changes: - [ebMSREQ] may be an inappropriate reference. The document is not � among those that came out of the Vienna meeting and is probably out of � date and not easily accessible. Any suggestions from the group regarding how we point to original requirements if this is no longer a valid document? - Figure 7-1 is still not quite correct. The Header Container arrow should � point to the rectangle enclosing SOAP-ENV:Header, not to the one � enclosing SOAP-ENV:Envelope.� There seems to be some disagreement here. The original change request from Dan Weinreb indicated the header container arrow should point to the MIME Part box, so that's how I revised it.� Maybe we need some further discussion on this one.� (Issue #69: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ebxml-msg/200108/msg00162.html) - There are minor problems in the signature example on page 60. The �� backward slash towards the end of line 2279 should be a forward �� slash instead. The namespace declaration for the dsig prefix on line �� 2282 is unnecessary.� I'll fix. - The eb:version="1.0" setting in the various examples should be updated �� to eb:version="1.1". Yes. - Line 1743 should say "an ErrorList element with the highest severity � attribute set to Error" to be consistent with line 1748.� The intent is to say� that an ErrorList element should NEVER be present with a StatusRequest element, which makes its severity attribute setting immaterial, so I believe this is okay as it is unless we need to rework to add clarification.� See line 1750-1752. - One bullet should be added after line 1756: * a StatusRequest element. See above comment.- Replace the schema definition with the attached XSD file content to � ensure that Appendix A and the separately available XSD file are � consistent. I have found one problem in the updated XSD I sent you � earlier: the ackRequested attribute was not declared with the right � data type. I have also updated the schema locations to point to � http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-msg/schemas Will do. Cheers, Arvola