[ebxml-msg] Edit Items.

[David Fischer <david@drummondgroup.com>]

We already voted NOT to do this kind of editorial round again. 

 

Excerpt from Conference Call 1-22-02

 

    Motion:  Following the validation of the specifications, if any clarifications to the

    specification are required, we will ballot that specification for consideration for

    submission prior to submitting to OASIS. � Bob, second: David F.

Question:  What do we mean by freezing technical changes?  (Doug)  Changing PositiveInteger to nonNegativeInteger is correcting

an inconsistency not a technical change.

 

Friendly Amendment:  Voting would be to consider any errata

from items received or implementation experience before it is

submitted to the OASIS membership.  These will be voted on as a new TC specification. � Chris.  Bob did not accept.

 

Comment:  We need a Change Control Officer for the next 6 weeks � Ian. (Doug agree).

 

Ian � any objections (no) motion passes.

 

Most of the items marked as Disagree are to comply with the vote cited above.  These items are not *correcting an inconsistency* nor *required clarifications*.  We can deal with this kind of thing in v3.0. 

 

I would like to withdraw my submission titled ebMS_v2_0revA.pdf.  Ian, please do not post to the web site.

 

Regards,

 

David Fischer

Drummond Group.