emergency-cap — archive

Proposal on versioning the CAP Terms committee note

From: Elysa Jones <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2020 15:24:00 -0000

Scott, I may be wrong but I think if we roll a version number it has to go through public review. Rex may know for sure of TC Admin can advise. I think after we publish, we will track changes in the revision history with working drafts until we are ready for a PR and new version. I’ve copied Chet on this for his insight. Thanks, Elysa From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Scott M. Robertson Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 12:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [emergency-cap] Proposal on versioning the CAP Terms committee note Unless OASIS policy doesn’t allow this … Regarding versioning of the CAP Terms committee not for updates to the CAP Event Terms List: what if we use minor numbers (to the right of the decimal point) for List (and editorial) updates, and major revision numbers for document content changes? Initial publication v1.0 First List update v1.1 List update and some editorial fixes v1.2 … V1.3 … v1.n Substantive content update v2.0 Just a thought Scott M Robertson PharmD, RPh, FHL7, GISP, CISSP Principal Technology Consultant Kaiser Permanente Technology Risk Office Health IT Strategy & Policy 310-200-0231 tro.kp.org ---------- kp.org/thrive NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you.