emergency-have — archive

[Rex Brooks]

Hi Darrell, HAVE SC listers, I wanted to let you know that Jeff solved the enigma I laid at your feet last week, and we're on track to be able to keep pace with the changes to EDXL-HAVE-v2.0 in terms of having the correct version of edxl-ct.-v1.0.xsd available for the final zipped package of HAVE for last roundup. Thanks for your help over this rather tortuous process. Cheers, Rex -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Adding FreeTextType, AlternateTexctType and LimitedString to edxl-ct-v1.0-wd07 doesn't validate in XMLSpy Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 11:31:12 -0700 From: Jeff Waters <jeffrywaters@gmail.com> To: rexb@starbourne.com Hi, Rex:   I was able to validate the attached file in Oxygen by making three changes.  Basically when referencing the LimitedString as a type, e.g. type= LimitedString , it needs to be prefaced with a namespace prefix, e.g. type= ct:LimitedString .  I made two of these changes, lines 70 and 85, and then also added ct: in front of the AlternateTextType on line 75, and that seemed to work.  It validated in Oxygen.   I did try to validate all the other files and ran into only one issue: edxl-ext-v1.0.xsd didn't validate due to a bad import.  It's trying to go up and directory and find a file that isn't there.   Hope this helps! --Jeff On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 6:59 AM, rexbroo < rexb@starbourne.com > wrote: Hi Jeff, The long subject pretty much says it. I attached the file, and all its associated schema, including those I need to drop. I am working with it in a folder that includes all imported schema, so there are no problems from that source. I put extra linespaces around the added items from edxl-have-v2.0 that the I pushed the TC to approve adding to the next Committee Specification of edxl-ct. I figured that if edxl-ct-v1.0-wd06 validated and edxl-have-v2.0 validated and I brought items in from edxl-have-v2.0 unchanged in themselves but with LimitedString first instead of last, it would validate. It doesn't. I'm cross-eyed. What am I missing? XMLSpy gives me this: File C:OASISOASIS EM TCEDXLSupportingElements EDXL-CTedxl-ct-v1.0-wd07 edxl-ct-v1.0-wd07.xsd is not valid.     'LimitedString' must refer to an existing simple or complex type.         Error location: xs:schema / xs:complexType / xs:sequence / xs:element / @type         Details             src-resolve: Value 'LimitedString' of attribute 'type' doesn't resolve to a type definition.     'AlternateTextType' must refer to an existing simple or complex type.         Error location: xs:schema / xs:complexType / xs:sequence / xs:element / @type         Details             src-resolve: Value 'AlternateTextType' of attribute 'type' doesn't resolve to a type definition.     'LimitedString' must refer to an existing simple or complex type.         Error location: xs:schema / xs:complexType / xs:simpleContent / xs:extension / @base         Details             src-resolve: Value 'LimitedString' of attribute 'base' doesn't resolve to a type definition. Sorry to be a bother, but you're more expert than I. This is being brought into edxl-ct to provide the basis for <comment> and to support multiple languages as edxl-have-v2.0 does. My goal is to have straightened out for next week's RIM SC meeting. Any help would be deeply appreciated. Obviously, I'm no expert with xsd. Cheers, Rex -- Rex Brooks Starbourne Communications Design Email: rexb@starbourne.com GeoAddress: 1361 Addison St. Apt. A Berkeley, CA 94702 Phone: 510-898-0670 Virus-free. www.avast.com Attachment: edxl-ct-v1.0-wd07.xsd Description: Binary data