emergency-if — archive

Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call

From: Art Botterell
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 15:39:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

emergency-if message

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call

From: Art Botterell <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:26:20 -0700

Pretty common, I think, for a proposal to be brought into the OASIS 
process already reasonably well-formed.  CAP, for example, already 
had two years of working group activity and two rounds of field 
trials behind it before it came into the TC.  One key reason is that 
we're a "technical committee"... our strength is in the technical 
aspects, but we have less depth in the operational / business process 
and user requirements, so for that we turn to the practitioner 
community.

In any event, I passed this to the IF team not for standardization 
but just for information about an ongoing activity that might help 
focus some of our conversations.

- Art

At 1:26 AM -0700 8/24/04, Kon Wilms wrote:
>My question is, what is the point of having the IF group even look 
>at this if it is already 'cooked'? Seems rather pointless and 
>defeats the purpose of a standards group, i.e. set standard -> 
>implement standard, or maybe I am missing something...
>
>Cheers
>Kon

References:

Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23 call
From: Art Botterell <[email protected]>
Re: [emergency-if] Fwd: [EDXL] "Wrapper" update from Monday 8/23call
From: Kon Wilms <[email protected]>

[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]