emergency-if — archive

Re: [emergency-if] Fw: INFRASTRUCTURE WRAPPER CONSTRUCT II

From: Rex Brooks
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 18:00:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->


















emergency-if message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Fw: INFRASTRUCTURE WRAPPER CONSTRUCT II




From: Rex Brooks <[email protected]>
To: "CONSULTRAC" <[email protected]>,       <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 12:01:15 -0700






Title: Re: [emergency-if] Fw: INFRASTRUCTURE WRAPPER
CONSTRUCT II


Hi Rick, All,


This is about twice as much as I would have put in it, but not so
much that I will get excited about it. We can get into specifics
later, but I think one thing we could do with whatever comes out of
discussing these specifics is to send it to IEEE, W3C and ISO (through
OASIS) asking, "We think we need this to provide for high stress
throughput at the network signal layer during emergencies, and/or as
general policy overall. What do you folks think?" I would make
sure that all of the standards bodies are sent it at once so that they
are aware that the other groups also have it.


Wrapper is a bit of a misnomer that gets associated with SOAP. I
think this can be included in the header, as Gary mentioned...


It's certainly something to think about.


Ciao,
Rex


At 11:48 AM -0500 9/7/04, CONSULTRAC wrote:
Re-send.
 
Rick