emergency-if — archive

Date/Time for combined SC meeting for gmlSF with DE and SitReps

From: Donald McGarry <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:31:00 -0000

Carl- Thanks. (Sorry I hit send by accident on the last note). Glad you pointed this out because this answers my “would be” question on whether to remove gml:Pos or add gml:posList to have both. Based on your comments I think we should keep pos in there and add posList so we have both if that is what others are doing. -Don [email protected] 703-595-9375 From: Carl Reed [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 11:58 AM To: Timothy Grapes; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [emergency-if] Date/Time for combined SC meeting for gmlSF with DE and SitReps Time OK with me. Back from Taiwan meetings. Also, the GML 3.1.1 PIDF-LO Shape Application Schema for use by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) allows either gml:Pos or gml:posList. Reason I bring this up is that many location payloads that may be used by an alerting system will be provided by lower level internet standards such as SIP, HELD, LOST, RADIUS, ECRIT, and PIDF. DHCP also now supports a location payload and there is a DHCP binary to GML mapping. So perhaps the same of gsf? Thanks Carl