emergency-msg — archive

Fw: [emergency] Fwd: Re: [emergency-comment] RE: Content ( was RE: [emergency-comment] RE: [CAP] RE: CAP-list digest...)

From: Richard Carlton
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 05:43:00 -0000

MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

emergency-msg message

Subject: Fw: [emergency] Fwd: Re: [emergency-comment] RE: Content ( was RE: [emergency-comment] RE: [CAP] RE: CAP-list digest...)

From: "CONSULTRAC" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:58:25 -0800

As usual, you're missing the point. Let me be clear, therefore. In my view
your list traffic on this issue is professionally divisive, irritating and
de-motivating, and your repeated personal attacks have been, and continue to
be, offensive and out of line.
>
This dialogue is NOT about you. It's about the production of a professional
standard that is globally viable and understandable to all users, in all
formats, and across all networks. If you can't accept fairly delivered
criticism offered responsibly by the committee's leadership, then please
find a group of professional nebbishes you CAN bully.
>
 Further, please feel free to "stack" anything you want. The production of
good solid work is fine by me, and I couldn't give a rat's tutu who's name
is on it - you can call it Gwendolyn, or attribute its genesis to a
passionate merger between Baba Ram Das and Elvis' Love Child for all I care.
But, at the end of the day, only the quality of the work counts, and if
there are concerns within the committee then they should be heard and
considered not denigrated. I have read no traffic from anyone on this list
to suggest anything other than a series of attempts to insure that the user
community is being properly heard and served by CAP, and attention to the
professional consensus of this committee is being appropriately sustained.
>
As for personal loyalty, I have house rabbits and they are quite loyal
thank you. This on the other hand is business.

 Rick

>
>
>