energyinterop — archive

Feedback proposals and questions

From: Ed Koch <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:18:00 -0000

I don’t want to be too presumptuous as to what Bill is doing, but I believe that yes the calendar object that has the attached values is part of the feedback message just like baselines and DR signals are. From: Gerald Gray [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 12:57 PM To: Koch, Edward; [email protected] Subject: RE: [energyinterop] Feedback proposals and questions Hi Ed, I like what you have hear Ed. I your proposed change to the service operation patterns, are we assuming then that the calendar info is/would come back on any feedback request so we don’t need a separate interaction just to get schedules? If so, then I agree with this change. Gerald R. Gray, PhD cell : 517.455.4824 fax : 517.913.6024 From: Koch, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 3:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [energyinterop] Feedback proposals and questions Enclosed is a document that we can use as in our meeting tomorrow morning to discuss Feedback. Bill and I split up the work. He is working on the calendaring mechanisms for attaching feedback values and I am working on the feedback attributes and interaction patterns. Enclosed is a document with my proposed changes and questions for the group. In general I did the following: - Enumerated some working assumptions and overall requirements - Made a minor refactor to group together attributes of a like nature for better readability. - Added a couple of new attributes - Created a datatype that can be used to instantiate values and attach to calendar objects. - Proposed some changes to the operations and their interaction patterns. - Added more documentation to existing attributes The enclosed document illustrates those changes and poses some open questions that we can discuss in our meeting tomorrow. Thanks, -ed Koch