energyinterop — archive

Feedback proposals and questions

From: Ed Koch <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:16:00 -0000

David, I think that using the term “series” as opposed to “collection” is a good idea. From: Holmberg, David [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 1:40 PM To: Koch, Edward; [email protected] Subject: RE: Feedback proposals and questions Ed, This looks very good for discussion. Thanks for your effort. “A feedback stream message may contain a collection of values wherein each value in the collection is referred to as a data point. Each collection of data points has the following characteristics…” Do we need to introduce the term “collection”? Can we say, “A feedback stream contains a series of data points. Each stream of data points has the following characteristics” Thanks, David From: Koch, Edward [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 3:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [energyinterop] Feedback proposals and questions Enclosed is a document that we can use as in our meeting tomorrow morning to discuss Feedback. Bill and I split up the work. He is working on the calendaring mechanisms for attaching feedback values and I am working on the feedback attributes and interaction patterns. Enclosed is a document with my proposed changes and questions for the group. In general I did the following: - Enumerated some working assumptions and overall requirements - Made a minor refactor to group together attributes of a like nature for better readability. - Added a couple of new attributes - Created a datatype that can be used to instantiate values and attach to calendar objects. - Proposed some changes to the operations and their interaction patterns. - Added more documentation to existing attributes The enclosed document illustrates those changes and poses some open questions that we can discuss in our meeting tomorrow. Thanks, -ed Koch