[OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-669) FSGIM Streams Compatibility

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80704#comment-80704 ] 

William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-669:
-------------------------------------------

For consideration, the proposed text needs to be contributed to the Energy Interoperation Technical Committee. The simplest way is to email the relevant document(s) to energyinterop-comment@lists.oasis-open.org after subscribing to that list. The Streams-related classes in the 2016 FSGIM model do not appear different from the WS-Calendar standard.

There are no links provided, and locating "FSGIM User Guide" has not succeeded. We request that the commenter identify and provide relevant documents. 

> FSGIM Streams Compatibility
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: ENERGYINTEROP-669
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-669
>             Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: cts
>    Affects Versions: CTSPR01
>         Environment: Steve Ray https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00005.html
>            Reporter: Toby Considine
>            Assignee: Toby Considine
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: ARCH-CONF
>
> Sections 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 (beginning at line 158) discuss conformance with WS-Calendar Streams and with FSGIM. It should be noted that FSGIM extended the idea of Streams beyond just a sequence of identical, contiguous intervals (as documented in the FSGIM User Guide, beginning at page 221). I would recommend that the CTS committee consider this more general specification, which supports the notion of Streams as well as other, less periodic sequences.
> Steve Ray



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)