[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-724) Transactions vs Contracts
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
William Cox updated ENERGYINTEROP-724:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: William Cox (was: Toby Considine)
> Transactions vs Contracts
> -------------------------
>
> Key: ENERGYINTEROP-724
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-724
> Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cts
> Affects Versions: CTSPR01
> Environment: Horia Pop; Lateral Inc https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202112/msg00001.html
> Reporter: Toby Considine
> Assignee: William Cox
> Priority: Major
> Labels: ARCH-CONF, editorial
>
> *Transactions vs Contract*
> The standard implies a one-to-one relationship between transaction and contract. In practice, I believe it is more appropriate to have a one-to-many relationship between transactions and contracts. Each party of a transaction will receive its own distinct contract (the counterparty may not be public to each other). Also, for the market to match an integral tender, t may have to match with multiple counterparties tenders to create a transaction.
> _[Lines 282, 318, 379]_
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]