[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-682) Expiration of Tender rule too restrictive
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-682?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=80765#comment-80765 ]
William Cox commented on ENERGYINTEROP-682:
-------------------------------------------
The text should move from the Semantic Elements from WS-Calendar section to Tender Facet. I have no objection to permitting any (or no) expiration date, with examples for spot market rollover.
Change Table 3-1 to limit the description of results , as this is semantic elements.
> Expiration of Tender rule too restrictive
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ENERGYINTEROP-682
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-682
> Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cts
> Affects Versions: CTSPR01
> Environment: Edward G. Cazalet, TEMIX https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202111/msg00001/Cazalet_Comments_on_CTS.pdf
> Reporter: Toby Considine
> Assignee: William Cox
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: FACET
>
> 6. In conflict with the Proposal, there are valid use cases for a tender that expires after the start time of theÂassociated interval.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]