[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (ENERGYINTEROP-719) Power vs Energy
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-719?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
William Cox updated ENERGYINTEROP-719:
--------------------------------------
Resolution:
Section 3.2.1 defines Resource Designator as an extensible enumeration as suggested elsewhere.
Market participants use their own conceptual models which continue to include power, energy, and other resouirces.
> Power vs Energy
> ---------------
>
> Key: ENERGYINTEROP-719
> URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/ENERGYINTEROP-719
> Project: OASIS Energy Interoperation TC
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cts
> Affects Versions: CTSPR01
> Environment: Horia Pop; Lateral Inc https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/energyinterop-comment/202112/msg00001.html
> Reporter: Toby Considine
> Assignee: Toby Considine
> Priority: Major
> Labels: CLARITY, PREREQ
>
> *Power vs Energy*
> In the initial part of the document both power and energy are referred to as acceptable values for a Resource. Given thereÃs an ongoing confusion between power and energy, I believe the TC should not promote both in the standard as acceptable.ÂTo have any practical TE use energy must always be bound to a unit of time and thus a rate of delivery (power). Whether the power should be levelized or follow an acceptable curve within the interval as defined in [EMIX] thatÃs beyond the scope. The resource that an actor tenders, transacts, delivers, and settles is energy. Power is just an attribute of that energy tender, contract, and delivery.
> _[Lines 11,16,17,229]_
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]