[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Proposal for XML syntax for catalogs
/ Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com> was heard to say:
| TR9401 says:
| The BASE keyword specifies that relative storage object identifiers (SOIs)
| in the right hand side of entries following this entry in the current
| catalog entry file should be resolved relative to the storage object
| identifier of this BASE entry.
|
| That would apply equally to the SOI in CATALOG and DELEGATE entries.
| Therefore, I assume we plan to do likewise. Using Norm's example,
That's what I intended. In the draft I will post shortly, anything
with an attribute type identified as "uriReference" would be effected
by xml:base.
| I'd also point out that, though Norm's example used a value of "absURI"
| for xml:base, the value of xml:base needn't be an absolute URI.
Right.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman.Walsh@East.Sun.COM | The present moment is a powerful
XML Technology Center | goddess.--Goethe
Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC