idtrust-sc — archive

[Carol Cosgrove-Sacks]

Hi Patrick, I think it would be worthwhile having a broader but focused discussion at the F2F. There is a huge "humaintarian affairs" community that could be interested. There could be important linkages between this and the ideas you have generated regarding other novel data exchange oportunities - and the experience of developing the work with IUCN would also be relevant.Maybe this discussion would be as much about "bizdev" as about the specific form of cooperation with the Red Cross and IDTrust? Cheers, Dr Carol Patrick Gannon wrote: >Dee, Jamie, > >So, how do we (OASIS Staff) help bring about appropriate mechanisms to >address this problem that David A. more clearly articulated? > >Is this just something that we can address with some type of multi-spec >(SAML/XACML/CAP/EDXL) InterOp Demo? [I don't think so.] > >Is this something that we should launch a Proof-of-Concept project around >(like OGC's OWS-5)? [Maybe, but we're not there yet with the PoC project >process & procedures infrastructure yet.] > >Is this another example of where TC-cross-pollination work could/should be >done? [Possibly YES. We'll need some thought and guidance as to how to >better identify the multi-TC opportunity and gain support from members for >some focused work.] > >Is this something we get members (from multiple disciplines) together to >talk about, as we do have more experience doing workshops? IDtrust has >funds to spend, so with the right proposal, we might be able to convince the >IDtrust MS SC to fund a consultant to develop some type of position paper >and/or organize a worksho0p within the next 5 months.] > >Is this an example that we should organize some staff time (at Staff F2F) to >discuss openly? > > >Please give some consideration to how we should respond to this identified >issue. Let Scott & Barbara know if we should schedule a Staff discussion >session at the F2F. > >Patrick > > > > >>