kmip-interop-tech — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Notes from KMIP interop call, March 9
KMIP interop call, March 9
Attending: Mathias, Bruce, Krishna (IBM), John, Steve (HP), Alan (SafeNet)
1. Recap of OASIS interop demo
mathias: The demos ran smoothly, lots of traffic (two full days + Monday evening + Thursday half-day), lots of fun :)
2. Statements of Use
mathias: mail from Bob regarding SoU - needed by mid-April according to current schedule (3x SoU for server implementations by the 15th)
mathias: OASIS requirements rather vague, but at a minimum must include: 1) Successfully implementing the specification in accordance with the conformance clauses specified (KMIP Spec section 12.1, which includes "at least one of the profiles" defined in the profiles document), and 2) Statement whether its use included the interoperation of multiple independent implementations
mathias: we are quite far along already with the Use Cases demonstrated at RSA, but still some things missing (e.g. Operation Policy Name attribute)
steve: need to do careful mapping of conformance statement <-> implementation, and need to be careful what we say in public statements (HP)
steve: are we stating we support the message formats, or server functionality?
mathias: OASIS requirements vague enough so that we can issue SoU while only supporting message format, but we need to clarify this so that we are all on the same page
bruce: curious of what EMC's status is wrt SoU since Bob is pushing for the spec to be out in mid-May (SoU by mid-April)
mathias: Bob said implementation folks onboard this week, should be joining POC call next week - don't have any further info at this time
3. Interop at Key Management Summit 2010, May 4-5 (Tuesday-Wednesday), Lake Tahoe, Nevada http://2010.keymanagementsummit.org/
steve: looking to see if we can participate, not in original budget so not so straightforward
mathias: will be discussing within IBM this week
alan: talked to Paul, SafeNet could possibly participate, but it depends on who else is coming
bruce: would be good to have more than one server and more than one client
4. Updating of implementations
mathias: spec changes will impact implementations (e.g. Usage Limits, revocation of active objects required before they are destroyed) - will not change deployed servers for now, but agree on when to do it on Tuesday's POC call
5. Daylight saving time, next weeks call (March 16)
mathias: US changing to Daylight Saving Time on Sunday - POC call scheduled in CET, so the call will be one hour later for folks in the US for the next two weeks
Regards,
Mathias
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]